BTemplates.com

Powered by Blogger.

Pageviews past week

Quantum mechanics

Auto News

artificial intelligence

About Me

Recommend us on Google!

Information Technology

Popular Posts

Showing posts with label Drosophila melanogaster. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Drosophila melanogaster. Show all posts

Friday, April 15, 2011

Mechanism of Long-Term Memory Identified


Using advanced imaging technology, scientists from the Florida campus of The Scripps Research Institute have identified a change in chemical influx into a specific set of neurons in the common fruit fly that is fundamental to long-term memory.
Researchers have identified a change in chemical influx 
into a specific set of neurons in the common fruit fly that 
is fundamental to long-term memory. 
(Credit: © Sebastian Kaulitzki / Fotolia)

The study was published in the April 13, 2011 issue of The Journal of Neuroscience.

"In studying fruit flies' learning and long-term memory storage, we observed an increase in calcium influx into a specific set of brain neurons in normal fruit flies that was absent in 26 different mutants known to impair long-term memory,," said Ron Davis, chair of the Scripps Research Department of Neuroscience, who led the study. "This logical conclusion is that this increase, which we call a memory trace, is a signature component of long-term memory."

The memory trace in question is an increased influx of calcium into a set of neurons after long-term memory forms in a part of the insect brain known as mushroom bodies, a pair of oversized lobes known to mediate learning and memory, particularly the memories of smell. They have been compared to the hippocampus, a site of memory formation in humans.

Increases in calcium influx also occur with learning in other animal models, Davis said, and it seems highly likely a similar correlation exists in humans.

Measuring Memory Traces


To measure the changes in the Drosophila neurons, Davis and his colleagues used functional optical imaging, an advanced technology that his laboratory helped pioneer for the study of learning and memory. Using protein sensors that become fluorescent when calcium levels are increased, the team was able to highlight changes in the levels of calcium influx into the mushroom body neurons in response to odor learning. These observed memory traces occur in parallel with behavioral changes.

Interestingly, these memory traces occur only with spaced conditioning -- where the insects receive multiple episodes of learning but with periods of rest between each episode. Spaced conditioning is required for long-term memories to form.

In an earlier study last December, also published in The Journal of Neuroscience, Davis found not only that fruit flies receiving spaced conditioning exhibited a long-term memory trace, but also that their memories lasted between four and seven days. In flies that were given a single episode of learning, memory formation lasted only a day and the long-term memory trace failed to form. These two studies are the newest in a series of six studies on the topic, including those published in the journal Neuron in 2004 and 2006, Cell in 2005, and Nature Neuroscience in 2008. Davis reviewed all of his studies of memory traces in the most recent issue of Neuron.

"The phenomenon of spaced conditioning is conserved across all species," Davis said. "No one really knows why it's important to long-term memory formation but there appears to be something magical about that rest period during learning."

The study was supported by the National Institutes of Health.

Sunday, April 26, 2009

The Story Of X: Evolution Of A Sex Chromosome


Move over, Y chromosome – it's time X got some attention.

In the first evolutionary study of the chromosome associated with being female, University of California, Berkeley, biologist Doris Bachtrog and her colleagues show that the history of the X chromosome is every bit as interesting as the much-studied, male-determining Y chromosome, and offers important clues to the origins and benefits of sexual reproduction.


"Contrary to the traditional view of being a passive player, the X chromosome has a very active role in the evolutionary process of sex chromosome differentiation," said Bachtrog, an assistant professor of integrative biology and a member of UC Berkeley's Center for Theoretical Evolutionary Genomics.


Bachtrog, UC Berkeley post-doctoral fellow Jeffrey D. Jensen and former UC San Diego post-doc Zhi Zhang, now at the University of Munich, detail their findings in this week's edition of the open-access journal PLoS Biology.


"In our manuscript, we demonstrate for the first time the flip side of the sex chromosome evolution puzzle: The X chromosome undergoes periods of intense adaptation in the evolutionary process of creating new sections of the genome that govern sexual differentiation in many species, including our own," she said.


Not all animals and plants employ genes to determine if an embryo becomes male or female. Many reptiles, for example, rely on environmental cues such as temperature to specify male or female.


But in life forms that do set aside a pair of chromosomes to specify sex – from fruit flies to mammals and some plants – the two X chromosomes inherited by females look nearly identical to the other non-sex chromosomes, so-called autosomes, Bachtrog said. The Y chromosome, however, which is inherited by males in concert with one X chromosome, is a withered version of the X, having lost many genes since it stopped recombining with the X chromosome.


In mammals, that probably took place about 150 million years ago, while in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster, a laboratory favorite, the sex chromosomes arose independently about 100 million years ago. In both humans and fruit flies, the Y chromosome has dwindled from a few thousand genes to a few dozen.


Hence the intense interest in why and how the Y chromosome lost genes once it stopped interacting with the X. Scientists have found that, as the only chromosome pair that doesn't break and recombine every time a cell divides, the XY pair in males is unable to take advantage of the main way deleterious genetic mutations are eliminated. The XX pair in females does recombine, but for the Y, the only way to get rid of a bad mutation in a gene is to inactivate or delete the entire gene. Over millions of years, inactive genes are lost, and the Y shrinks.


"If you have no recombination, natural selection is less effective at removing detrimental genes," said Bachtrog. "Y is an asexual chromosome, and it pays a price for that: It keeps losing genes."


Bachtrog, whose career has revolved mostly around the study of the degeneration of the Y chromosome, decided to focus on the X chromosome several years ago and went about searching for sex chromosome pairs that have arisen more recently – and thus might be in the process of adapting to their new role. Her paper centers around study of the three sex chromosomes in a rare western fruit fly, Drosophila miranda, a darker-colored cousin of D. melanogaster. (Many creatures have more than one pair of sex chromosomes; the platypus, for example, has five pairs, all inherited together.)


While one of D. miranda's sex chromosomes is descended from the original sex chromosome that appeared in Drosophila nearly 100 million years ago, a second originated perhaps 10 million years ago, and the third about a million years ago. The older two look much alike, Bachtrog said: The Y chromosome in each pair has lost genes to become a shadow of its former self, while the two X chromosomes are indistinguishable from each other.


The third and youngest sex chromosome is different. The Y is not yet shriveled, though it contains many non-functional genes – about half the total – that will eventually be lost. The X, which is dubbed neo-X, is undergoing rapid change, however, with about 10 times the normal amount of adaptation seen in the autosomes, according to the researchers.


By adaptation, Bachtrog means that the gene sequences in the X chromosome are becoming fixed as random mutations have finally settled on a few beneficial changes that accommodate the increasingly irrelevant Y chromosome. Between 10 and 15 percent of neo-X genes show adaptation, compared to only 1-3 percent of autosome genes.


"In hindsight, that is not surprising," Bachtrog said. "Neo-X is facing a much more challenging situation than the autosomes because its pair, the Y chromosome, is degenerating. Its genes are no longer producing proteins, so neo-X has to compensate by up-regulating its genes. We find a lot of genes on the X chromosome are involved in dosage compensation."


In humans, for example, all genes on the X chromosome are twice as active to account for the lack of genes on the Y. Women accommodate this by inactivating one entire X chromosome so as not to produce too much protein, Bachtrog said.


Another change in neo-X that Bachtrog suspects is taking place is the elimination of genes that are harmful to females. Biologists have realized recently that some genes have opposite effects in males and females, and evolution is a tug of war between males jettisoning genes that they find detrimental only to have females put them back, and vice versa.


"A good place to put sexually antagonistic genes that are beneficial to one sex but detrimental to the other is on the sex chromosomes," she said. The Y always ends up in the male, she said, so genes on the Y chromosome won't affect females.


"Conversely, the X chromosome becomes feminized with genes that are good for the female but detrimental to the male," said Bachtrog, adding that the X also becomes demasculinized, losing genes that are of use only in the male.


In search of more insights into the evolution of the X chromosome, Bachtrog said she is looking for fruit fly species with older and younger sex chromosomes "to study sex chromosome evolution in action." She said evidence suggests that adaptation to being a sex chromosome is most intense between 1 and 10 million years after it starts. Bachtrog also is completing assembly of the genome sequence for D. miranda, which is not among the 12 species of Drosophila currently targeted by the genome sequencing community. She hopes that the fly will become a model system like D. melanogaster.


"Now, finally, we are within reach of studying model systems like D. miranda that we couldn't think of several years ago," she said, predicting that "whole genome comparisons will revolutionize evolutionary biology, ecology and many other fields."


The research was funded by the National Institutes of Health, an Alfred P. Sloan Faculty Research Fellowship in Molecular and Computational Biology and a David and Lucile Packard Foundation Fellowship.



If you like this post, buy me a beer at $3!
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Sunday, April 12, 2009

Sleep: Spring Cleaning For The Brain?


On the left, the brain of the well-rested blue fly has low levels of a synaptic protein called BRP in this 3D view from a confocal mircoscope. On the right, the brain of the sleep-deprived fly glows orange in areas of BRP concentration. (Bruchpilot or BRP is a protein involved in communication between neurons.)In the tired fly, the protein is present at high concentartions in three major areas of the fly's brain that are associated with learning. Sleep reduces the levels of this protein, an indication that synapses get smaller and/or weaker. This process of "downscaling" may be important so the brain is reset to normal levels of synaptic activity and can begin learning again the next day. (Credit: Courtesy of UW Health Public Affairs)

If you've ever been sleep-deprived, you know the feeling that your brain is full of wool.


Now, a study published in the April 3 edition of the journal Science has molecular and structural evidence of that woolly feeling — proteins that build up in the brains of sleep-deprived fruit flies and drop to lower levels in the brains of the well-rested. The proteins are located in the synapses, those specialized parts of neurons that allow brain cells to communicate with other neurons.


Sleep researchers at the University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health believe it is more evidence for their theory of "synaptic homeostasis." This is the idea that synapses grow stronger when we're awake as we learn and adapt to an ever-changing the environment, that sleep refreshes the brain by bringing synapses back to a lower level of strength. This is important because larger synapses consume a lot of energy, occupy more space and require more supplies, including the proteins examined in this study.


Sleep — by allowing synaptic downscaling — saves energy, space and material, and clears away unnecessary "noise" from the previous day, the researchers believe. The fresh brain is then ready to learn again in the morning.


The researchers — Giorgio Gilestro, Giulio Tononi and Chiara Cirelli, of the Center for Sleep and Consciousness — found that levels of proteins that carry messages in the synapses (or junctions) between neurons drop by 30 to 40 percent during sleep.


In the Science paper, three-dimensional photos using confocal microscopy show the brains of sleep-deprived flies filled with a synaptic protein called Bruchpilot (BRP), a component of the machinery that allows communication among neurons. In well-rested flies, levels of BRP and four other synaptic proteins drop back to low levels, providing evidence that sleep resets the brain to allow more growth and learning the next day.


"We know that sleep is necessary for our brain to function properly, to learn new things every day, and also, in some cases, to consolidate the memory of what we learned during the day," says Cirelli, associate professor of psychiatry. "During sleep, we think that most, if not all, synapses are downscaled: at the end of sleep, the strongest synapses shrink, while the weakest synapses may even disappear."


The confocal microscope views show this happening in all three major areas of the fruit-fly brain, which are known to be very plastic (involved in learning).


In a paper published last year, Tononi, Cirelli and their co-investigators found similar chemical changes in the synapses of rats' brains. They also showed that rats' brains have a stronger "evoked response" to electrical stimulation after being awake, and a weaker one after sleep. That finding provided more evidence, using electrophysiological rather than molecular techniques, consistent with the idea that synapses grow stronger during the day, then weaker during sleep.


Because sleep performs the same function in the brains of species as diverse as fruit flies and rats, Cirelli says it was likely conserved by evolution because it is so important to an animal's health and survival.


The Wisconsin laboratory has pioneered ways of studying sleep in different species, including fruit flies.


To keep the flies awake, they're put into a "fly agitator" that holds 10 plates, each containing 32 drowsy flies. A robot arm shakes the plates occasionally to keep the flies from dozing.


Flies were deprived of sleep for as long as 24 hours. Researchers then dissected their brains and measured the levels of four pre-synaptic proteins and one post-synaptic protein. All levels rose progressively during periods of wakefulness and fell after sleep. Other experiments confirmed that the changes in protein levels were not caused by exposure to light and darkness or by the stimulation itself, but by sleep and waking. They also used confocal microscopy and an antibody that specifically recognizes BRP to measure the expression of this protein in many fly-brain areas.


Higher levels of these synaptic proteins during waking may be evidence of random experiences that fill the brain every day and need to be dissipated to make room for the learning and memories that are truly significant.


"Much of what we learn in a day, we don't really need to remember," Cirelli says. "If you've used up all the space, you can't learn more before you clean out the junk that is filling up your brain."

==================================================================

Journal reference:

  1. Giorgio F. Gilestro, Giulio Tononi, and Chiara Cirelli. Widespread Changes in Synaptic Markers as a Function of Sleep and Wakefulness in Drosophila. Science, 2009; 324 (5923): 109 DOI: 10.1126/science.1166673
Adapted from materials provided by University of Wisconsin-Madison.


If you like this post, buy me a beer at $3!
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]